New studies outline ‘wider benefits of high speed rail’

Listen to this article

The carbon footprint of high speed rail can be ‘up to 14 times less carbon intensive than car travel and up to 15 times less than aviation even when measured over the full life-cycle of planning, construction and operation’, new research claims.

The figures are outlined in two new research reports detailing the ways in which railways contribute to a more sustainable transport system.

Using case studies and new data, the reports, carried out by consultancy Systra for the International Union of Railways (UIC), also demonstrates the benefits of high speed rail in terms of speed, reliability, comfort and safety.

The main report, ‘High Speed Rail and Sustainability‘ considers the social, economic and environmental aspects of high speed rail performance, and makes a compelling case for why rail has major advantages in all three areas.

The accompanying background report, ‘Carbon Footprint of High Speed Rail Lines‘, takes four case studies of high-speed rail lines (two in Europe and two in Asia) and carries out a transparent, robust assessment of carbon emissions for each route, including the planning, construction (track and rolling stocks) and operation phases.

For example, emissions on the high speed Méditerranée line from Valence to Marseille average 11.0g CO2 per passenger km, compared to 151.6g CO2 per passenger km for car and 164.0g CO2 per passenger km for air.

The environmental ‘pay back’ time for this route – the length of time it takes for the emissions saved by the impact of the new high-speed services to overtake the additional emissions produced through the line’s construction – was just 5.3 years.

New high speed lines can lead to ‘significant reductions’ in CO2 emissions by creating modal shift from air to rail.

For example, 48,000 less tonnes of CO2 are now produced on the Madrid to Seville corridor following completion of the high-speed line – and have a lower direct land-take requirement than roads (2.5ha/km v. 1.3ha/km).

High speed rail, which is only operated on the electrified network, can directly benefit from the ‘greening’ of the energy supply network, which over time will reduce its carbon emissions even further.

The economic benefits of high speed rail are also featured: the reports show how high speed rail supports and helps economic development in the cities that are linked by these routes.

An example cited is the French city of Lille, where a new inner-city high speed station was built to help stimulate regeneration of the city.

Over a 13-year period from 1990-2003, the number of tourists in the city increased 15-fold.

UIC Director General Jean-Pierre Loubinoux said:

“With COP17 in Durban and Rio+20 coming up in 2012, these reports provide timely evidence of the carbon and sustainability benefits of high-speed rail worldwide.

“The UIC High Speed Congress in Philadelphia in July 2012 offers stakeholders the opportunity to learn more about these important advantages of the sector”.

CER Deputy Executive Director Libor Lochman said:

“The Transport White Paper proposed earlier this year that the European high speed rail network should triple in size by 2030 and be completed by 2050, to help ensure that the majority of medium-distance passenger transport can go by rail.

“This report underlines the sustainability benefits that putting our trust in high-speed rail would bring, in addition to the benefits for the travelling public.”

Director-General of UNIFE, Philippe Citroën, said:

“The European rail industry welcomes the publication of the UIC reports which confirm that high speed rail is a solution to increase transport sustainability.

“The development of a European very high speed rail network should therefore be one of the key priorities of the European transport policy.

“This would contribute to improving transport safety, decreasing the impact of transport on the environment, and increasing the competitiveness of Europe.”

2 COMMENTS

  1. I saw on the lines above that everyone is interested mainly in profit. I didn’t see any comment coming from any future possible passenger. The profit is the least that the future passengers are interested in. It seems that no one mentioned the safety, health as the real profit of the passengers.
     There also other aspects that sustain the high speed railways development. Beside the less polution of the environment, for the ones frequently travelling by airplanes will be less exposure to radiation (as you may know, the flight attendants and pilots are often affected by cancer and other deseases caused by radiation), the food on the flight is also radiated, the internet access is limited. Flight are limited by available air space for landing and take-off. 
    While on the high speed train, there is no radiation, one can work or rest whenever he wants, food is not affected, the noise is reduced and the space is bigger. Traffic of high speed trains can be increased if there is a real demand by only adjusting the schedule on a convenient way. 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Rail News

ORR review leads to 50% reduction in maximum fees for ticket refunds

New rules will mean that from 2 April the maximum fee that train operators and ticket retailers can charge...

More like this...